Many things used to be done in haime are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
In this technical era, people are getting dependent on machines for household chores rather than doing it manually. This essay intends to discuss the merits and demerits of this advancement.
To begin with, there are multifarious optimistic changes brought by this development. Lifestyle of people have undergone through a flock of changes. It has been easy for the houseworkers to do the work with machines. The work of hours can be done in minutes with the help of technical devices. In addition to it, individuals can work from home, as their work is done by machines and they just have to control them. Furthermore, the household expenses are declined as one has not to pay salaries because the tasks performed by the servants are now completed by gadgets.
Apart from the advantages, the technology has brought a lot of pessimistic changes too. Lifestyle of people have become sedantry. No one is willing to work manally. Individuals just want their work to be done automatically by electrical devices. This change has made them lazy. People are becoming prone to diseases because of sitting spare for the whole day. Obesity, headache, anxiety, etcetra are the prominent diseases seen in people who are folloeing this development and not pursuing any another work with it. Along with it, laziness kills the fitness of your body.
To sum up, the advancement of technology is helpful but one should never be wholly dependent on machines for the daily chores.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | harmankaur1203 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | khoa.d.le08 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | khoa.d.le08 | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | khoa.d.le08 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Babal | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e the prominent diseases seen in people who are folloeing this development and not purs...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, apart from, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02880658436 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7494824689 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572016460905 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6079954207 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8823529412 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2941176471 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162659995712 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486426101573 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530740550309 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102034316771 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142561531652 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.