Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
In today’s modern world, the proliferation of animal testing has led to some controversial ideas in the public. While some people believe that this act is inhumane, others support its tremendous benefits. From my point of view, although there are some ethical-related problems to researches on animals for the sake of humans, I am of the opinion that this is a necessary evil.
On the one hand, there are a myriad of reasons why animal experiments are unethical and unwarranted. The first thing to notice is that people will subject the animals to suffering, excruciating pain and even death during the researches. As there are several vivisections on the specimens, the animals such as mice or monkeys will certainly go through trauma and the ramifications of those experiments are overwhelmed. As a result, the researched animals have better living conditions and their generations can deteriorate.As a matter of fact, humans have no rights to violate other species’ chances to live and nourish. Moreover, those sacrifies may even for nothing as not every animal bears the same ailments as human such as cancer, HIV, schizophrenia and scientists have to induce the symptoms on the subjects. Paradoxically, the outcomes will be erroneous and the trials on human will fail.
On the other, I tend towards the bight sides that the researches on animals can bring to human beings. One thing worth considering is that animal testing can assist with the appearance of life-saving drugs. Thanks to the fact that some animals bear close resemblance to human, the scientists can rely on those cells and structures to make researches and invests medicines. The test on chimpanzees exemplifies this the clearest when it provided the base for the hepatitis vaccine. Furthermore, animal testing is not only helpful in creating vaccines and drugs but it can also underpin the process of researching with less amount of time needed. Apparently, the life cycle of animals is shorter, so the scientists can do research on different generations of mice or monkeys more conveniently and constructively. Thus, they can save astronomical time and money as well as bring the cures to people more quickly.
In conclusion, while there are both good done and harm done to animal-based experiments, I am convinced that people can take great advantages from them including better life saving drugs, more appropriate samples and time-saving research subjects.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-23 | mtrang2712 | 73 | view |
2023-02-09 | scan010 | 87 | view |
2021-08-24 | samdilnura | 77 | view |
2021-07-07 | my220904 | 61 | view |
2021-03-11 | fmichela | 78 | view |
- In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study whereas in other countries students attend university in another city Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages
- In a number of countries some people thinks it s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 73
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The information below give details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 78
- THE DIAGRAM BELOW SHOWS A POSSIBLE FUTURE MEANS OF HOME ENERGY PRODUCTION 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...y evil. On the one hand, there are a myriad of reasons why animal experiments are c...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'clearest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: clearest
...est on chimpanzees exemplifies this the most clearest, when it helps with the appearance of h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91898148148 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81689947019 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539351851852 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7997148977 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4117647059 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201969036355 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673601023903 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402789163819 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123115862433 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507612901545 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.