The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video.
The bar chart compares the change of sales on three different product categories on a global scale over a 4-year period starting from 2000. The categories are games software, DVD/ VIDEO and CDs.
Overall, CDs items remained the products which people spent the most money, followed by DVD/video, games software. This order did not change over the year, although the numbers for CDs declined, accompanied by a general increase in sales of game and DVD items.
In 2000, a total of about $70 was allocated, half being spent on CDs ($35), below a fifth for the DVD/video ($18). By 2001, the sale of DVD/ video increased marginally to over $20 while the figure for CDs remained stagnant at initial level. Also showing a significant growth was the cost of DVD/ video, which rose by roughly $15 in the subsequent two years.
At the same time, despite starting from the lowest number in all groups, the sales of games also went up during this period, but less sharply. Sales increased from about 13 billion dollars in 2000 to just under 20 billion dollars three years later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | cupinsiuway | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | manjiinder_singh | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | hannahng | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | hannahng | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | hannahng | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 73
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 78
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 78
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...CDs remained stagnant at initial level. Also showing a significant growth was the co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71351351351 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36972627737 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632432432432 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3760964631 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353818054031 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147689445677 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710559763364 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213280154802 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680144683776 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.