advantages and disadvantages of genetically modified trees
The reading and the lecture are both about booming industry of genetically modified trees. Accordingly, the author provides three outstanding benefits of these trees which promise better characteristic through changed organisms’ genes. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of the theories and cast doubt on each of the claims. The lecturer is of the opinion that such trees are not as great as is mentioned in the reading and cause various problems.
To begin with, the writer argues that natural trees consist of differential species which each of them can endure different harvests; so, their survival is ensured. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. In contrary, artificially modified trees can only tolerate distinguished threatens that the trees are designed to be resistant against, such as climate changes and insects. Therefore, since unified trees persistent to certain dangers are planted in a place whenever, for instance, climate changes all these trees will be demise and wiped out.
Secondly, the writer disputes that genetically modified trees bring about economic benefits for the farmers. To delineate, genetically corrected trees have tendency to grow faster and provides more fruits and wood which lead to faster farming investment return. In contrast, the lecturer opposed this notion by asserting that planting these trees have hidden costs for the company selling them, seeds and so on. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that peasants must pay the company an amount of money each time that they plant these expensive seeds.
Finally, the author averts that genetically modified trees avoid extremely cutting of the wild trees for industry and housing industry as they grow faster and are able to totally satisfy the demand. In contrast the lecturer stance is that modified trees grow aggressively among wild trees. Hence, the professor puts forth to the idea that local trees are not capable of competing for resources and water because these trees grow much ore faster that them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | sefeliz | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | 宋致遠 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | Simin_MB | 65 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 73
- it is better to learn from those at your own level like students or people at higher level like teachers 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students do not respect their teachers as much as they did in the past 70
- do you agree or disagree that in the past younger people rely on their parents to make decision for them, and today the are more able to make decision independently 73
- hindering poaching activities and saving rhinos 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...able to totally satisfy the demand. In contrast the lecturer stance is that modified tr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29447852761 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58253062197 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555214723926 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2072709776 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.066666667 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290635078955 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104935935412 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781105545095 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18841376871 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374441648596 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.