The line graph shows TV news viewing figures over a one-year period. Write a report of at least 150 words summarizing the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the daily ratings for news that aired on channel one at four different timeframes in a year
Overall, although the viewer numbers of the 6pm news decreases over the year, it was still the most popular show at the end of the year. Furthermore, the increase in popularity of the 11pm show saw a corresponding decline in the 9:30 version, while the 1pm show’s viewership was stable and generally the lowest
In January, tv news at 6pm was watched the most by around 5 million viewers a day. However, this figure was witnessed with many fluctuations until September, where it dropped to approximately 3.5 million at the end of the year. Followed by ratings of 9:30 pm news, which increased slightly before plummeting to reach its lowest point at almost 1 million in August, then grew back to 3 million viewers in December
In contrast, the news at 1pm did not see any considerable changes in their viewers while it almost leveled off all the year at around 1.5 million. Remarkably, not until the first day of May was the 11pm news introduced with only 200000 watchers. This figure then soared to fractionally over 4 million views in August, undertaking the most-viewed show ( 6pm ) at that time. Nevertheless, after that, watchers of this lastest news shrank dramatically to even less than that of the 1pm version in the final month
- Some people believe that it is a good idea for older people to work if it is possible for them to do so Do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 78
- The maps demonstrate how the center of Islip town are planned to change 73
- The table below shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 tonnes 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t aired on channel one at four different timeframes in a year Overall, althou...
^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at four different timeframes in a year Overall, although the viewer numbers of ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...August, undertaking the most-viewed show 6pm at that time. Nevertheless, after t...
^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, undertaking the most-viewed show 6pm at that time. Nevertheless, after that, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73548674281 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58547008547 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.1735338596 43.030603864 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.571428571 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 5.23603664747 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226834531855 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109851575423 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717814715089 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15204061858 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026111979113 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.