The line graph shows TV news viewing figures over a one-year period. Write a report of at least 150 words summarizing the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides information about the ratings for a news show that aired on Channel One at four different times during the day: 1pm, 6pm, 9:30pm, and 11pm. The latter edition was implemented at the beginning of May.
A broad assessment reveals that although the 6pm news was the most popular show, its viewer numbers decreased over the year and were briefly overtaken in August by the 11pm news. Furthermore, the increase in popularity of the 11pm show saw a corresponding decline in the 9:30pm version, while the 1pm show’s viewership was stable and generally the lowest.
Firstly, the 9:30pm show’s viewers grew steadily from 3.2 million in January to about 3.8 million in May, but then sank rapidly to become the least-watched version by August, with just over a million views. Meanwhile, after starting in May with only approximately 200000 watchers, the 11:30pm news soared to fractionally more than 4m views in August, making it the most-viewed show at this time. Nevertheless, after this surge in ratings, watchers of the latest show shrank dramatically to become the least popular show with slightly under a million views per day, which was just under the 1pm show’s 1.2 million consistent views.
As for the 6pm show, despite being the most popular, its figures fluctuated with an overall decline so that by August it had around three and a quarter million viewers, down from 4.8 million in January. It rebounded to 4 million daily views in September but then continued its general slide, finishing with around 3.2 million people watching it on a daily basis
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 93
- The pie charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02651515152 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.621953718 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6812146636 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.444444444 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172963484729 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785703869207 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439773168242 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109247481051 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421306940017 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.