The maps show the change of Happy Valley Shopping Center from 1982 to 2012
The given maps illustrate the development that occurred in Happy Valley Shopping Center, over a three-decade period between 1982 and 2012. Overall, the Center was completely transformed into the more modern center, except for entertainment areas and restrooms that remained stable over the period.
In particular, when it comes to outside of the building, in the northwest, the Lake was demolished to make way for the construction of Furniture Retail, which expanded more space for the building. Besides, what stands out from the graph is that Parking lot was established in the southwest corner in the year 2012.
Meanwhile, in terms of the inside of the shopping mall, entertainment areas in the center and toilets in the southwest of the building were untouched with no change done to it. Additionally, to the west of the building, lobby area was established at the entrance. As can be seen, next to Furniture Retail, a coffee shop was knocked down in 2012.
Concerning the food store, situated in the north of the mall, was converted into sports and electronics stores. To the eastern of the shopping mall, three stores were removed and made way for the development of food store, themed restaurants and two empty rooms.
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourism industries Why Is it a positive development 89
- Many animals are endangered Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- the maps show changes between 1960 and now in the station street 84
- More and more plastic waste has polluted cities countrysides and oceans What problems does it cause and what measures can be taken 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06896551724 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81088768324 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0908128121 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236270116992 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092090949177 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115224603941 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128125890436 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104605808332 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.