The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010
The pie charts compare different areas for exportation of their nations, namely Argentina, Mexico and Chile in 2010
Overall, while Latin America was the largest export market of Argentina and Chile, this region accounted for a really marginal fraction of Mexico’s destinations of export. Nonetheless, most of the Mexican goods were exported to the USA, and Chile showed the evenest distribution in its export-markets
With regard to Argentina and Mexico, their exports were almost identical when other Latin America was the largest market of their exportation, which accounted for 38% and 31% of Argentina and Chile’s export locations respectively. Meanwhile, 26% of Argentina’s exports went to Europe, 16% to the USA and 20% to other regions. Likewise, Chile’s exports consisted of 30% to Europe, 18% to the USA and 21% to other countries
In contrast, a vast majority of Mexico’s exports were to the USA, with more than three-quarters ( 82%) exports transporting to America. The remaining countries importing Mexico’s goods all constituted 6% of the whole export markets of this country other Latin America was the least popular export region for Mexico.
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled Overall the recycling of 61
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they be punished 61
- The pictures describe an island named Paradise island in the past and in the present 93
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the USA, with more than three-quarters 82% exports transporting to America. The...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, nonetheless, really, while, as for, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47252747253 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95898379081 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.7832228678 43.030603864 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 199.2 112.824112599 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.4 22.9334400587 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.4 5.23603664747 313% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29465533416 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155552629686 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554707747176 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188079124602 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485686623481 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.2329268293 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 61.2550243902 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.3012195122 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 32.5 11.4329268293 284% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.