Because computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately, learning a foreign language is a waste of time.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this digital era, it is universally accepted that computers can totally replace the role of a dictionary as they can translate languages correctly in a short time, thus, it is unnecessary to learn a new language. Personally, I partly agree with this statement because of a ton of benefits a person can gain from knowing a second language
On the one hand, it is undoubtedly that technology nowadays is so advanced that it makes translating become just a matter of seconds. In detail, there are some appliances that are able to translate every language in the world by analyzing their algorithm. The users can get the translation in just under a minute with a high level of accuracy and even some of them can be used without being accessed to the Internet.
On the other hand, accumulating a foreign language does not only revolve around understanding it but also to help people open up their minds to a whole new culture. Specifically, a foreign language teaches far more than its vocabulary and grammar, along with having a deeper insight into a country’s uniqueness and traditions, you can form a new way of thinking. In addition, people who know more than one language can have more advantages when it comes to occupation. For example, applicants can make a greater impression on their employers if they are able to speak many languages
To conclude, it is fascinating to see computers have a profound power to translate everything so fast and accurately. Although the advancement of the current technology is undeniable, I still believe that being acknowledged about many languages are of paramount importance for everyone
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK Compare and contrast necessary information 73
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 tonnes 67
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if they are able to speak many languages To conclude, it is fascinating to see co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, still, thus, even so, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99635036496 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99889202905 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598540145985 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.4166586983 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.111111111 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4444444444 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277678538644 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110551547591 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443000693856 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157055088346 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643426126897 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.