The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.
The two pie charts illustrate the volunteers’ proportion in various fields of organizations in 2008 and 2014.
In general, there are six voluntary fields summaried in the graphs. The subjects making up the largest and smallest portions in 2008 were Educational and Health Care, respectively. Meanwhile, in 2014, the highest proportion belonged to Environmental while the Health Care maintained its lowest position.
To begin with, the Educational, which occupied the biggest part at 24%, became the dominant subject in the entire 2008 chart. To contrast, the most humble figure of 7% of volunteers was owned by the Health Care. Equivalently, Sport and Others took the similar positions with 15% for each subject.
However, some considerable changes occured in the six following years. By 2014, the Environmental had overtaken the most superior position of the Educational with 29%. A slightly upward trend of 1% happened in the Educational number, from 7% to 8% in 2014. Last but not least, two significant changes in the Educational and Sport’s numbers were depicted clearly in the charts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bobsubnot | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
- Almost more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news Do you agree or disagree 78
- There are more and more parents working full time Some people argue the childcare centres are the best in taking care of young children Others think grandparents are better carers Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others howerver believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35838150289 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01551336581 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64161849711 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0276668141 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.2727272727 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193491467065 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698246130244 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100195795368 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14611964542 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129369893448 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.