Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The argument mentions that academies should encourage students to have majors which can make them rich. It is definitely a good idea for every student to think about their future income; however, passion is the most important thing in everybody's job.
First of all, satisfaction is the most significant thing to pay attention to and not the money when it comes about major decision. Thus, students need to think and see what kind of job they want in the future. Imagine a student who encouraged by counselors and family members to choose medical field, but he/she actually loves to be a social worker. If that student decides to be a doctor, he/she might end of being bored to study and even drop out of school because interest can make a big difference to continue our path or not especially when things get overwhelmed.
Additionally, being successful might be a different definition for everyone. Consider someone who wants to enjoy her/his job whereas someone who just want to make a lot of money. People cannot be successful in their jobs when they do not care about their job responsibilities. When people do not like their job, it can bring frustration at work. They even might not have good attitudes with their co-workers. Thus, they might not be willing to continue their job when something even small goes wrong.
However, some people might believe that money is everything in job which cannot be true all the times. It can be true sometimes, but if people have passion about their career, they can earn more money eventually. For example, a waiter can work from bottom line and get more experience with promotion to become a restaurant manager someday. It might take longer than someone who already has a managing degree, but later or sooner a waiter will get what he wants.
It might be a dream for everyone to have a lucrative career, but money is not everything. Encouraging students to choose majors which can make a lot of money for them is good, but at the end of day, happiness is much more important than money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | TiOluwani97 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | PranaviN | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-25 | shashank__hegde | 33 | view |
| 2022-12-16 | Christiana Longe | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | yyh123 | 75 | view |
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 50
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 62
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 54
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 58
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, so, thus, whereas, for example, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75706214689 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57868605228 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5209224661 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5555555556 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146683870567 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548211154398 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440719763155 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104384449381 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468060457006 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.