agree or disagree? young people nowadays have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
The young generation of a society is the altering unit for that country. While some sociologists believe that youngsters are not influential in society, some others argue that they are the most effective building block of every nation or country. In my view, young people are one of the influential factors for every society for two main reasons.
First and foremost, thanks to the enrichment of technology, the internet can provide youngsters--mostly-- an easy way to communicate and interact with each other, so juveniles can connect to the internet in a fraction of a second and chat with their friends and families. As we know, rapid transportation of information can alter a social climate to another more than any other factor. For example, recent tensions in Europe firstly started from social media. As a result, with the leverage of social media, which is a direct fruit of technology, the United Europe Nations legislated most of the rebellions demands, and also, we know most of the revolutionist forces were among young people.
Secondly, according to the improvement of public health services in many developed countries, population growth is increasing tremendously. More population growth means more youths, making them the most influential unit of society. Since many authority positions will be filled with young new forces, many scientific rules will be given to them, which makes them effective even in science improvement and technology manufacturing, which both are the leading parts of society.
To put it in a nutshell, I refused the idea of the question because I believe that the internet with social media has made young people more connected to themselves more than ever, and due to the population growth, most leading parts of society will be filled by them, and as a result will make them more influential.
- How has technology made our lives better 66
- rewarding school age children with money 73
- hgmgvm 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally One cannot learn how to develop it 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17056856187 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9328681976 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558528428094 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.6628120491 48.9658058833 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.545454545 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0653588497781 0.236089414692 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307624680594 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432522103114 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474156488128 0.150856017488 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035950301765 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.