The graph shows the percentage of people who recycle their rubbish, in five countries, over 12 years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar chart illustrates how much recycling that people from five different nations did between 1992 and 2004. Looking from an overall perspective, it is manifest that the percentage of the UK and US citizens who did recycling increased over the given period, while the remaining three nations’ percentage decreased or stayed unchanged.
To begin with, the UK led in percentage of people who recycled at 26 percent in 1992 and continued to maintain its position by increasing the percentage to over 30 in 2004. Follow by the US, whose percentage also grew over 12 years, from about 16 percent in 1992 to nearly 20 percent in 2004.
On the other hand, the figures of Japanese and Singaporean showed a relative decline over the period. In Japan, the percentage went down from 11 percent in 1992 to around 8 percent in 2004, whereas the Singaporean figures dropped from 6 percent to 5 percent. Besides that, the percentage of German people who recycled their trash remained stable at percent from 1992 to 2004.
- Traffic congestion is a growing problem in many cities today What are some of the causes of traffic congestion and what measures can be taken to help reduce it 89
- Governments around the world spend too much money on treating illnesses and diseases and not enough on health education and prevention Do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
- Governments alone cannot be expected to solve environmental problems It is also the responsibility of businesses and individuals to help To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Many governments spend millions of dollars in space exploration and research as they feel it is an important investment however many citizens feel that it is a waste of money Discuss both these opinions and include your own 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, so, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93063583815 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67258384348 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7951577759 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170440403434 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960168989518 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443365086545 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128831025252 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169604271708 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.