The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
» Write at least 150 words.
The graph illustrates changes in the consumption of fast food of teenagers in Australia in the 25-year period between 1975 to 2000. It can be obviously seen that the number of times eaten of hamburgers and pizza have all increase while the fish and chips one has significantly declined.
The consumption of pizza and hamburgers dramatically climbed during that period. After starting at just 5 times in 1975, pizza gradually became prevalent, got a rapid increase until it reached a peak of almost 85 times in 1995, after which it plateaued for many years. The hamburgers at the beginning of the period were about 10. However, this was then followed by a surge and ultimately reached at the same level that fish and chips began, with consumption at 100 times per year in 2000.
The fish and chips consumption, on the other hand, shows a different trend, being on the decrease during this period of time. In 1975, the fish and chips proportion was the majority of fast-food consumption in Australia with a high of 100 times per year. However, after a ten-year period of volatility between 1975 and 1985, the demand for this fast food decreased sharply to about 40 times eaten in 2000.
In conclusion, Australian teenagers had a considerable change in choosing fast food from 1975 to 2000. Obviously, hamburgers and pizza were becoming more favored than fish and chips.
(233 words)
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-07-21 | sinisterchill9 | 61 | view |
2021-12-11 | Jenna Vu | 78 | view |
2021-08-18 | kwuynh | 80 | view |
2021-08-17 | Tabassum Zaman | 73 | view |
2021-07-28 | lwof | 82 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 82
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rend, being on the decrease during this period of time. In 1975, the fish and chips proportion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...s had a considerable change in choosing fast food from 1975 to 2000. Obviously, hamb...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89361702128 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68311285878 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51914893617 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.636572668 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.545454545 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159491373526 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739441753409 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833619325153 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117861031378 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461937154291 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rend, being on the decrease during this period of time. In 1975, the fish and chips proportion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...s had a considerable change in choosing fast food from 1975 to 2000. Obviously, hamb...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89361702128 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68311285878 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51914893617 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.636572668 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.545454545 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159491373526 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739441753409 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833619325153 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117861031378 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461937154291 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.