The table give information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937, 1967 and 2017
The table compares Manchester University’s students enrolling in three years: 1937, 1967 and 2017. Overall, it is clear that the total number of newcomers has increased over the year. Moreover, the percentages of female and male students fluctuated in a certain range, while there was a contradiction between the figures for students coming from foreign countries and students living within 40 miles of Manchester.
In 1937, there were nearly 330 students who enrolled at Manchester University and this figure significantly grew by approximately 6000 students after 8 decades. With regard to gender, the rate of female students was recorded lower than male students’ percentage by 10% in 1937. Then it was magnified to 30% with 35% for girls and 65% for boys in 1967. However, the year of 2017 evidenced a reverse and the distance was shortened to 10%.
In terms of geographic distance, this university witnessed a sharp decline in the percentage of nearby students from 55% to 15% in 30 years since 1937 and it even decreased to a small fraction in 2017. Meanwhile, the figure for students who come from 4 countries in 1937 slightly rose by 1% with a wider range of 26 nations in 1967 and it has reached a surprising rate of 32% students from over 100 nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | Gnaight | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-06 | Joel James | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-31 | vdrobny | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | vannhi0501 | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-31 | Harry1804 | 42 | view |
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge and exper 64
- The table give information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 89
- The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05434782609 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96352670786 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3982540177 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444502904317 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200784049367 0.103423049105 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116314410847 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303973954061 0.15604864568 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872446050146 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.