The given graph shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990
Write a report for a university lecturer making comparisons where relevant and rerportingthe main features.
The pie charts demonstrates the proportions of five different key sources providing the American with energy in 1980 and 1990.
As can be seen from the charts, oil is the most common source of energy for the population of the USA in both two given years while the least common ones were nuclear power and hydroelectric power.
In 1980, the proportion of oil consumption was 42%, which was slightly higher than that of oil consumed in 1990 (33%). Natural gas took up 26% in 1980 and in the next ten years, the figure for this source was marginally lower, 25%.
Coal used for generating energy made up 22% of the five given sources in 1980, while the figure for this material consumed in 1990 was higher, 27%. Although hydroelectric power remained stable in those two years, both at 5%, the use of nuclear power in the generation of energy increased significantly, from 5% in 1980 to 10% in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | kimtaeyeons | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | kimtaeyeons | 11 | view |
- Some people say that schools should concentrate on teaching students academic subjects that will be useful for their future careers Other people say that subjects such as music and sports are also necessary Discuss both view and give your own opinion 73
- The given graph shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer making comparisons where relevant and rerportingthe main features 11
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15559443115 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507389162562 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1727536319 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.555555556 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0173131753813 0.215688989381 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00868806440319 0.103423049105 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0177515823993 0.0843802449381 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0106536091777 0.15604864568 7% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011449717068 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.