The bar chart illustrates how male and female students chose subjects to study in a particular university in 2005.
The bar chart illustrates how male and female students chose subjects to study in a particular university in 2005.
Overall, more male students chose sciences, mathematics, literature and law than female students, whereas there was an opposite pattern in social sciences, languages and the arts. However, there was no difference in the number of males and females chose humanities in 2005.
It can be seen from the chart the number of male students choosing sciences was twice as much as that of their female counterparts, with the figures being 22 thousand and 11 thousand respectively. Similarly, 10 thousand male students chose law as opposed to 5 thousand their female ones. Also, mathematics was chosen by approximately 18 thousand male students, which was 14 thousand more than the figure of female students. While 15 thousand males majored in literature, there was less than 3 thousand females chose this subject to study in 2005.
In contrast, whereas 25 thousand female students in the faculty of social sciences, only a half of that number was their male counterparts. It is clear that the number of females choosing the arts as a major was double that in the figure of their male ones. The biggest difference is seen in languages major in which there was roundly 17 thousand females, compared with only a thousand males, whereas the number of male and female students choosing humanities was the same, at 11 thousand students each gender.
- The bar chart illustrates how male and female students chose subjects to study in a particular university in 2005 67
- The bar chart illustrates the number of male and female students in thousand in a particular university chose subjects to learn in 2005 67
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports or musicians. 74
- task 1 11
- The bar chart illustrates how male and female students chose subjects to study in a particular university in 2005 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... approximately 18 thousand, which was 14 thousand more than the figure of female ...
^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., whereas 25 thousand female students in the faculty of social sciences, only a ...
^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents in the faculty of social sciences, only a half of that number was their mal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12749003984 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72541993877 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442231075697 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0641416923 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.7 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362220087062 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230446467957 0.103423049105 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.261737293198 0.0843802449381 310% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.39582122683 0.15604864568 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.350060461814 0.0819641961636 427% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.