The line graph below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line plot demonstrates the amount of land which is used for producing organic food in two countries from the year 1985 to 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that after a certain time in both countries the production increased rapidly but suddenly it climbed down and ended at almost the same amount.
In 1985 both countries began from the same amount which was 25 thousand hectares, then it was raised gradually until 1990. After that in 2000, both countries reached their highest amount of land. In the case of country A, the amount was close to 300, approximately 275 thousand hectares, while country B was less than almost 100 thousand hectares. In 1996 both lines intersect with each other, which means both countries had the same amount of land.
After 2000 both countries started to decrease slowly. In 2005 the difference between them remained approximately 100 thousand hectares. Then in the case of country A, the line went down sharply and ended below 150 thousand hectares. Same for country B but not as sharply as country A and stopped at 150 thousand hectares.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | Sanaullah97 | 87 | view |
- Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 78
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...untries had the same amount of land. After 2000 both countries started to decrease...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91443850267 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45877677532 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.611168554 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172874355535 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860721237042 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721337089532 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13551059187 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930792051586 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.