The diagrams below give information about changes in a student accommodation.
The illustrated images demonstrate various features in terms of discrepancy in student accommodation between 2010 and now.
A first glance at the diagrams reveals that there were remarkable changes in the North and the South compared to the initial construction in the year 2010. additionally, it can be seen that some features revolving around the lodging were renovated.
As is shown in the maps, regarding the inside of this accommodation, bathroom, student-bedroom in the middle, another bedroom for the student in the East remained unchanged. However, the kitchen was enlarged for an additional purpose which is a social area. Moreover, a novel en-suite room was erected in the Southeast. Looking at the North, the living room and a small part of garden land of the year 2010 was completely extirpated. This dimension was equally divided for two remained bedrooms and a new one.
Turning to the outside, the South land of the garden was eliminated to make way for car parking. In the North, more trees were planted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- Some argue younger are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graph below shows population variation in three wildlife species from 2011 to 2016 in North America and its coastal areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows population variation in three wildlife species from 2011 to 2016 in North America and its coastal areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- School and university students learn lessons far better from their teachers than from other sources such as the Internet or television To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt accommodation between 2010 and now. A first glance at the diagrams reveals t...
^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
... initial construction in the year 2010. additionally, it can be seen that some features revo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing around the lodging were renovated. As is shown in the maps, regarding the i...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r two remained bedrooms and a new one. Turning to the outside, the South land o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, moreover, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13095238095 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92709505953 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1913255708 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089757560497 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302081570885 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466480179788 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568787782356 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425617756595 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.