Scientific innovation is always a positive thing and should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
In this day and age, it is widely believed that scientific innovation has a vital role in leading us to a more convenient life. Whereas some are in favor that science novelties should be encouraged by no means. Personally, I do not completely advocate this mentioned notion because of several reasons.
An obvious benefit is that the revolution of science simplifies our daily work. With the use of it, people can learn in every department. For instance, in education, teachers can use multimedia instead of the chalkboard to save time in class; in business, a computer automatically archives all the information about clients. Thus, the improvement of science brings many benefits to humanity. In contrast, the appearance of robots is probably a huge difference. Due to their features included getting human's work faster and easier, nobody prefers to spend more effort. Consequently, people's creativity and problem-solving abilities will also become decrease.
Another advantage of this advance can be shown that base on the novelty of science, scientists have figured out many sources of energy, supply with human's life. Some energy sources are put into practical use more based on the principles of science, such as solar energy, wind energy, etc. They really have solved some difficulties. difficulties that humans have encountered. On the contrary, it was also because of science that before that, radioactive energy and nuclear weapons were also produced and became a danger to humanity. Their consequences include the nuclear disaster at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan that killed countless people.
All things considered, while science improvement has a lot of beneficial effects, it remains adverse. Since many times this improvement can cause great loss to society, they should only be encouraged partly including the benefits it has brought to mankind so far,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-04 | caomaiphuong050605 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | caomaiphuong050605 | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-22 | hardyboywwe | 84 | view |
- As mass communication and transport continue to grow societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity To what extent d 73
- Scientific innovation is always a positive thing and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 84
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining teacher training qualifications in 2005 6 and 2006 7 and the proportion of male qualifiers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 75
- Creativity is the key to problem solving To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons to support your answer 89
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n leading us to a more convenient life. Whereas some are in favor that science noveltie...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Difficulties
...y really have solved some difficulties. difficulties that humans have encountered. On the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, really, so, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37627118644 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90398689775 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640677966102 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5601973046 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1111111111 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112894785092 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300713764548 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350631104804 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768107079525 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451065767441 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.