The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010, 2012 and 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates how many vehicles in different modes of transportation ran in Australia in three years 2010, 2012 and 2014.
As can be seen from the table, the number of passenger vehicles was recorded to be the highest in all surveyed years while that of light trucks was the lowest. Moreover, motorcycles showed the biggest increase in the percentage.
In particular, there were 11 million vehicles for passengers in 2010, which was 5 times greater than the figure for commercial vehicles. The next years 2012 and 2014 both witnessed a quite similar pattern in those categories, in which the number rose by 18.22% for the former and 12.4% for the latter. Meanwhile, there were only 106.000 and 131.000 light trucks driven in Australia as the lowest and the highest figure of its own survey, making this the last place.
Interestingly, the percentage change in the number of light trucks was fairly high, at 23.5 %. It was the motorcycles that had the biggest shift, of 30.7%, which was 3 times as high as that of heavy trucks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-28 | thomas242 | 100 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | 12345-6789 | view | |
| 2021-08-07 | my220904 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | namphong020 | 67 | view |
- In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study whereas in other countries students attend university in another city Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- To succeed in a business one needs to be good at maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- the diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87005649718 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61232934621 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587570621469 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7719392163 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0979670030672 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440140192992 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590755602564 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715104694185 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074355746162 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.