A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The speaker asserts that nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum before entering college. In my point of view, since nation is responsible for maintaining country development, and training experts, nation have to require students to study the same national curriculum until enter college; requiring students to study the same curriculum has a positive effect on country and country; And requiring students to learn the same curriculum is feasible; Therefore, adopting this recommendation have a positive influence on country. I totally agree with the speaker.
To begin with, nation is responsible for requiring students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college. The nation have to maintain continuous development, and to train enough experts. In many country, there are many reforms in the education fields to ensure every students can get much education, and to facilitate country in the future. In a word, nation have responsibility of requiring students to study the same national curriculum before they enter the college.
Further, requiring all of students to study the same curriculum has a positive effect on students. Since this methods improve students’ will of learning, students will increase probability of success. For example, in Taiwan, students are studying some curriculum until enter the university; With a fair competition, students will focus on studying, fulfilling them to facilitate development of vocation in the future. In other word, this test are increasing the students’ will of learning. In sum, requiring students to study the same national class have a positive influence on students.
Finally, the things that nation require all of its students to study same curriculum is feasible. Nation has enough resources to research and develop a series of national curriculum. At the same time, this method can save more money, and all revision is convenient, because only relevant sector plans this curriculum. For instance, in Taiwan, as only ministry of education manages education information, including admission requirement test, and arranging curriculum, the admission test can hold on schedule constantly. In brief, when government want to reform, it is feasible to require all students to learn same curriculum before enter the university.
To sum up, to develop country and train experts for country, nation should require all students to learn the same curriculum before entering college; With a fair competition, students will take so great pains on studying, then this methods will benefit the country; And it is feasible to require students to study the same curriculum because government have resources. So, I strongly agree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 62
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reas 58
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 66
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...as a positive effect on students. Since this methods improve students’ will of learn...
^^^^
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...l take so great pains on studying, then this methods will benefit the country; And i...
^^^^
Line 9, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is feasible to require students to study the same curriculum because government h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in brief, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2349.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50117096019 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88906230458 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.393442622951 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 741.6 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 16.0 4.38483146067 365% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 99.2564880273 60.3974514979 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.631578947 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408041898988 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177830884315 0.0831039109588 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128455868484 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293189727776 0.150359130593 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738148117032 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.