The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011.
Given is the line graph contrasting the rate of cinema-goers categorized into four discrete age groups in a particular European country over a phase of 11 years, commencing from 2000.
Perceptibly, residents in any group of age were inclined to frequent the cinema over the years. Furthermore, despite sustained fluctuation in the proportion, those in the age of 15 to 24 preferred to watch movies in cinemas more than the other three groups.
Accounting for by far the highest rate in the first year with approximately 16%, the 15- to 24-year-olds experienced an accretion in the rate to 32% four years later. The period of the next 6 years brought volatility in the vicinity of 32% and 52% of people who visited the cinema before reaching its zenith of around 55% in some early months of the year 2011. Even though a minimal drop in the percentage was recorded in the later months of 2011, it still ranked first compared to the others’. By contrast, the oldest group with people who were 35 years or so always constituted the lowest rate despite a 12 percent leap from merely 1% in the first year to 13% in the last year given.
A 6 percent disparity in the proportions of the youngest group aging from 7 to 14 and the 25 to 35 age group was documented in the year 2000 with the former’s starting point at 10%. These two groups shared a similar soaring trend when both rates reached their peak of 38% for the former and 33% for the latter in 2010. The last year witnessed the slump in the youngest group’s rate while the reverse was true for the other; however, both ended up at sharply 30%, which ranked second in the percentage of people watching films in the cinema.
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 78
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work in a larger company than a small one 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- THE MAP BELOW SHOW THE CHANGES THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE TOWN AT THE SEASIDE RESORT OF BEACH BETWEEN 1950 AND 1990 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 301.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60465116279 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58412397422 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 106.607317073 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568106312292 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.7224711102 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.6 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235524681441 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982792669592 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543516900222 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148931863642 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289356746393 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.