The line graph illustrates the data about the proportion of people going to the theater once a month and more in terms of 5 age groups in a country in Euro over the period from 2000 to 2011.
As can be clearly seen in the graph, the figure for a group of people who age from 15-24 remained highest among groups. Moreover, all five groups increased over the period shown.
In 2000, the percentage of 15-24 age group stood at 15%, compared to 2% in a group of 35 and over age people. The proportion of people being from 7 to 14, at 10%, doubled the figure for 25-35 age group, which was at 5%. From 2000 to 2005, the percentage of the group aged from 15 to 24 witnessed a significant increase up to approximately 30%, doubled its figure in 2000. At the same time, both groups of people from 7-14 and 25-35 accounted for 15% of each group, while the 35 and over age group remained stable.
In 2007, the 15-24 age group reached a peak before plummeted in 2008, then increased to 52% by 2011. The figure for the 7-11 age group and 25-35 age group fluctuated from 2006 to 2011 and ended up at 30% for both figures. The age group from 35 and over experienced a gradual increase and stood at 10% in 2011.
- It is believed that art such as poetry music painting and so on could be produced by any one Others think differently saying that it acquires special abilities for a person to create art Discuss both views and reach a conclusion from your own perspecti 61
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 73
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 67
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26637554585 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25504314373 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471615720524 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.427314737 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304007686152 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155913722163 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679090076659 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221249816491 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614118255382 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.