The line graph illustrates the data about the proportion of people going to the theater once a month and more in terms of 5 age groups in a country in Euro over the period from 2000 to 2011.
As can be clearly seen in the graph, the figure for a group of people who age from 15-24 remained highest among groups. Moreover, all five groups increased over the period shown.
In 2000, the percentage of 15-24 age group stood at 15%, compared to 2% in a group of 35 and over age people. The proportion of people being from 7 to 14, at 10%, doubled the figure for 25-35 age group, which was at 5%. From 2000 to 2005, the percentage of the group aged from 15 to 24 witnessed a significant increase up to approximately 30%, doubled its figure in 2000. At the same time, both groups of people from 7-14 and 25-35 accounted for 15% of each group, while the 35 and over age group remained stable.
In 2007, the 15-24 age group reached a peak before plummeted in 2008, then increased to 52% by 2011. The figure for the 7-11 age group and 25-35 age group fluctuated from 2006 to 2011 and ended up at 30% for both figures. The age group from 35 and over experienced a gradual increase and stood at 10% in 2011.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 73
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations 67
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26637554585 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25504314373 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471615720524 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.427314737 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304007686152 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155913722163 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679090076659 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221249816491 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614118255382 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.78 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.