It is true that people spend more of their time watching international films than domestically produced films. There are several reasons why this could be the case, and I believe that governments could take steps to foster the locally produced film industry by supporting it with finance.
There are several reasons why foreign movies are so dominant in the market share. Firstly, it is easily noticed that foreign films are invested with a huge budget. As a result, many high techniques and effects are applied to make movies more thrilling and absorbing. For example, a blockbuster named Avatar with high-quality movie magic gains a huge revenue just up to hundreds of billions of dollars after a few days published. Another reason why local films are less attractive is that movies produced by foreign countries have many superstars. With the appearances of a number of huge stars, many of their fans watch the movie. Moreover, their craftsmanships and skills, which are apricated by critics, are the determinants to attract attention from the public.
However, there are several steps that governments could take to tackle these problems. With financial support from governments, several talented amateurs would have chances to produce movies with high quality, which helps the domestically made film industry develop, and reinforce our positions in the international market. Moreover, producing thrilling local movies also encourage tourism to develop. As many movie scenes are made in many breathtaking views of the country, many viewers and movie fans come to see them, which betters resident’s lives when inhabitants serve local cuisine and sell souvenirs to tourists.
In conclusion, there are two primary reasons contributing to the situation. Fortunately, governments can take steps to tackle the problems.
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010
- It is believed that art such as poetry music painting and so on could be produced by any one Others think differently saying that it acquires special abilities for a person to create art Discuss both views and reach a conclusion from your own perspecti 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 67
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41901408451 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83093993026 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7116263793 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344542429003 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110673723175 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10963365621 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219211590355 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163171619117 0.056905535591 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.