Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems. Some people say they should be banned.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a fact that there is an increasing number of plastic bags used in shopping, which have a negative effect on the environment. In my opinion, plastic bags ought to be forbidden due to their harm to terrestrial and marine life.
It is clear that plastic bags cause a myriad of damage to humans and plants on the ground. First, plastic items mainly made from polythene have to take a long time to decompose, creating long-term consequences for human life. For example, as the collection system cannot handle the garbage, gigantic landfills are built throughout the roads annually, which is conducive for harmful bacteria to proliferate. Second, the habit of littering indiscriminately can make discarded plastics mix into the soil. As a result, not only plants but also animals and people are poisoned because of the pernicious chemicals in plastic.
Another influence of plastic bags is that they destroy the water ecosystem. To begin with, discarded plastic items sinking into the ocean pose a threat to aquatic creatures as they mistake plastics for food. Turtles, for instance, suffer from entanglement and ingestion of plastic debris. In addition, plastic waste floating around ponds and rivers can cause clogged sewers. Thus, obnoxious odors can be quickly produced, which put the respiratory system of living organisms in jeopardy.
In conclusion, the prohibition of plastic bags is essential because of their discernible effect on the environment regarding terrestrial and undersea life. Government and individuals should use bags made from environmentally friendly materials such as paper and fabric instead of plastic bags to protect habitats.
- Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37931034483 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89404197053 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9734086083 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207404480679 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762475143198 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483301824162 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136955197008 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306862681214 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.