Claim: Military training strategies, such as unit cohesion and drilling, are powerful techniques to use in a classroom.
Reason: These strategies allow students to focus on a task and think like a team, supporting one another to reach a goal.
Develop a response to the claim in which you discuss whether or not you agree with it. Focus specifically on whether or not you agree with the reason upon which they claim is based.
More and more, military training strategies are being tauted as powerful techniques and are being integrated into business and organizational models. The vast benefits of military training strategies such as focus, discipline and teamwork are apparent and help individuals succeed in life. As such, military training strategies should be used in the classroom so that students can reap in their benefits.
First and foremost, one of the biggest military training strategies is discipline. Discipline is essential to the military because strict adherence to responsibilities and standards help a team function like a well-oiled machine, which might be the difference between life or death. By educating children in a way that promotes discipline, this can instill in students a guide to preserverance and focus. Discipline allows students to put in the hard work and effort needed to focus on tasks, that will then translate into helping them achieve their goals. Research shows that learning a musical instrument early on in life helps instill discipline in children, which then leads to future academic success in life. Since not all students come from families that can offer the luxury of learning a musical instrument, if we were able to implement another method in which we could instill discipline among students, the students will benefit from it by learning to focus on their workload to achieve their dreams.
Furthermore, an important part of military training strategy is team cohesion. This strategy helps promote teamwork within a squadron. Team cohesion can benefit students and teach them to think like a team. Students will learn how to communicate effectively in group settings by working together, which can not only lead them to develop empathy but also give them an introduction to management. Team building exercises can help students excel both as an individual and as a member of society. This will indubitably provide them with the communication and social skills needed to succeed in life.
Opponents of incorporating military training strategies into the classroom will say that perhaps military training strategies are too harsh on students in the classroom. After all, they’re still at a tender age where it is vital to improve their confidence and self esteem, which might be demolished by military training strategies. However, students are tougher than we think they are. By succeeding in an environment that uses military training strategies, students will then become more confident through thier hard work and preserverance. Additionally, these military training strategies can be modified so that we don’t have to subject our youth the the harsh conditions of the actual military. Thus, such concerns can be easily overcome and we can continue to reap the benefits and rewards.
In conclusion, we need to prepare our students not only for their academic successes, but also instill in them soft skills that can allow them to succeed in life. By instilling discipline, focus and teamwork in students, we are doing our best to prepare them for life.
- Claim Military training strategies such as unit cohesion and drilling are powerful techniques to use in a classroom Reason These strategies allow students to focus on a task and think like a team supporting one another to reach a goal Develop a response t 66
- Some economists use the measure of the total value of goods and services that a country produces annually called the gross domestic product or GDP as the measure of a nation s economic health Others contend that the GDP is an inadequate measure because it 80
- The following is from an editorial in a legal journal It is now apparent based on data that has been collated from several independent studies that asbestos is the cause of lung cancer emphysema and other respiratory illnesses in the miners of Coal Valley 68
- A nation should ultimately be responsible for the health welfare and prosperity of its own citizens Write a response discussing your reaction to the stated policy Justify your reasoning for the position you take Explain the potential consequences of impli 80
- Claim The National Endowment for the Humanities NEH should be funded entirely by private foundations Reason The National Endowment for the Humanities cost the US government over 160 million every year In a period of fiscal restraint and political polariza 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 652, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...that we don’t have to subject our youth the the harsh conditions of the actual military...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 652, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...that we don’t have to subject our youth the the harsh conditions of the actual military...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, thus, well, after all, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2611.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32857142857 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88389877364 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483673469388 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 799.2 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6125214616 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.52173913 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3043478261 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.60869565217 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281482876252 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974872007533 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757040692979 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167048886852 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804274498038 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.