With the pressure on today’s young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (e.g.: physical education and cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether non-academic subjects should be involved in the school curriculum remains a question of intense debate. While a number of people believed that non-academic issues should be removed from the syllabus so that students can wholly focus on academic ones, others claim that those subject matters are of equal importance to students’ development. I personally agree with the latter idea for a variety of reasons.
Firstly, forcing students on theoretical subjects would create a stressful and uncongenial school environment. Most academic areas seem extremely sophisticated and require great diligence; therefore, eliminating non-academic subjects would bring about a more tedious and exhausting learning atmosphere. As a result, students are easily deprived of their learning interests and lack the motivation to make progress, leading to an increasing likelihood of early school drop-out.
Secondly, non-academic fields can be extremely beneficial to children’s development. For instance, physical education can prevent obesity and consequently reduce the risks of various life-threatening diseases such as diabetes, heart attack, hypertension, etc. Arty subjects can promote creativity and develop cognitive skills. Down-to-earth courses such as cookery can equip students with essential life skills that can assist them when tackling various arising circumstances. Conversely, the exclusion of these subjects would raise an unhealthy, uncreative and bookish generation.
In conclusion, non-academic subjects are vital not only to children’s success but also to their development. For this reason, there should be an incorporation of academic and non-academic ones in today’s syllabus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-14 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-14 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 56 | view |
- Many people believe that students in remote areas should be given bonus points in the national graduation exam Others believe that no one should be given that advantage Discuss both points and give your opinion 95
- Write a paragraph about the typical characteristics of Vietnamese people 56
- With the considerable benefits computers and the Internet brings about they can completely replace the traditional roles of teachers Do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 73
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give you 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether non-academic subjects should be involve...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.14644351464 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2592235457 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65690376569 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.766555629 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46513116914 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150589910817 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113879529117 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282790410561 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112883478076 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.39 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.