The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water
consumption in two different countries.
The chart compares the amount of water used across the world for agriculture, manufacture, and domestic in a period of a century, also the water consumption between Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo in 2000.
It is clear that the water use increased dramatically worldwide between 1900 and 2000, especially in the water needs for agricultural activities. The table also showed a huge gap on water spent in Brazil beyond the use in Congo.
In 1900, the amount of water used for the industrial and domestic sector was nearly zero, in comparison with the high demand in agriculture which was about 500km3. By 2000, the consumption of water for industrial and housing had increased gradually while it had roared significantly to around 3000km3 for agriculture.
For more details in 2000, the table showed that Brazil used 26,500km3 for their irrigation system, and each Brazilian consumed 359m2 over the population of 176 million. The figure of Congo was totally different, while they used just only 100km2 for irrigating their land and each inhabitant used only 8m3. Congo’s population was about 5.2 million at that time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1847826087 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75624398546 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559782608696 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4623503495 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0165085700216 0.215688989381 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0118636910631 0.103423049105 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0216722697132 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00995822502528 0.15604864568 6% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100642275392 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.