Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school. Why is this? Should this be taught in schools?
There is an opinion saying that it is the full school responsibility to educate children how to present. In my opinion, adding such kind of skills in curriculum not only boost kids’ confidence but also attributes to improve their social life.
To begin with, the presentation would lead to build a child’s self-esteem. That is, if children know how to speak on public, they will have better confidence. A good example of this is the politicians, who trained for long none stop speeches. Furthermore, the other benefits of these kind of abilities are becoming more sociable. In other word, the more they have speaking skills, the stronger communication abilities they can establish in the future.
Moreover, there is an argument if schools should shoulder the responsibility to teach pupils the public speaking skills. Predominantly, it could teach in the better quality at schools as there are both the pleasant atmosphere and the qualified mentors. Firstly, lower age differences lead to less embarrassment if they go wrong during a presentation. To put it differently, the friendly atmosphere causes the healthy competition. A good example of this is group studying. Secondly, an experienced mentors at school help children to grow their presentation skills in the most proficient way.
All in all, nowadays learning to give a public speech is necessary as it helps to build a confidence and improve communication skills. Having such ability would obtain better if it is taught in early age at school by an expert person, since there is more friendly atmosphere.
- Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school Why is this Should this be taught in schools 61
- Some people focus on news in their own country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The given pie charts show data on the population ages in Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and also projected these portions of the population for the year 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wh 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transportDisucss both the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...hes. Furthermore, the other benefits of these kind of abilities are becoming more sociable...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'mentor'?
Suggestion: mentor
...roup studying. Secondly, an experienced mentors at school help children to grow their p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2125984252 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04497463762 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586614173228 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7724083699 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.2666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183386440608 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543961203464 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490596231523 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101059922202 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416054597153 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.