The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The provided graph gives information on the proportion of oil consumption in 4 countries namely Iceland, Sweden, Italy and Turkey over a period of time from 1966 to 2006.
A glance at the graph reveals that half of the studied nations exhibited a downward trend, whereas Turkey was on an upward trajectory. Meanwhile, the figure for Italy slightly fluctuated.
As presented in the graph, in 1996, the amount of oil usage in Turkey was the least of four countries with 60%, whereas that of Italy ranked first at 90%. However, during the 40-year period, while Turkey experienced a significant increase in the percentage of energy consumption, Italy showed a moderate fluctuation ranging from 80% to 90%. In 2006, Turkey leapfrogged Italy by an approximate 5%.
A quite different picture can be seen in Sweden and Iceland, the proportion of which decreased sharply to 40% and 30% respectively. Commencing from 1986, while Sweden showed a gradual fall to nearly 30% in 2006, Iceland experienced a small rise in 1996 and then steeply decline to 20% in 2006.
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are more successful Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant write at least 150 words 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...celand, Sweden, Italy and Turkey over a period of time from 1966 to 2006. A glance at the g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03409090909 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82621198312 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2857007984 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159142565791 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653490509802 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467319143782 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953524193155 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448475057056 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.