Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Everyone knows that a sound mind lives in sound health. To balance our fitness level we have to maintain some health rules such as taking hygienic food, daily physical activities, proper sleep, and so on. Some people believe that to ensure the improvement of public health the facilities related to sports should be enhanced and another group dissent this idea and suggested that we should emphasize more on other measures. In the following paragraphs, both views will be discussed and finally, my opinion will be given.
To begin with the former idea, sports facilities such as increasing the number of playgrounds, gym,s and other facilities are not adequate to promote public health. Nowadays most of the people leading a busy life, especially the office workers who work almost all day long in the office by sitting in a chair. Therefore, the sedentary lifestyle is increasing day by day in society. Moreover, few people are conscious about their health, and they use limited time to go to a fitness center and do some exercise. Furthermore, opportunities can not confirm the improvement of health because facility utilization depends on people's interests.
On the other hand, to make people aware of health the government can take the necessary steps. Firstly, arrange a camping program so that people can know about the rules of keeping sound health. Secondly, the food habitation, most of the people, especially the young, take fast food or junk food which works as a catalyst to increase obesity and in the long run cause serious health issues. In that case, the government should encourage people to eat healthy food regularly and for this task, they can use social media such as Facebook to advertise. Thirdly, the most important is the environment, the authorities should create a healthy environment where the amount of pollution is so low.
In conclusion, to sum up all the points above, in my opinion, by considering contemporary lifestyle we should give more importance on other measures that are helpful for health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-25 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Ediyorbek521 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | Alili | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The chart below gives information about the ratio of income to spending in dollars by Americans by age range in 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 72
- It is common nowadays for each member of family to have their own peace of modern technology Some people think that this will lead to a break down in the family relationships and communication to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U S from 1960 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...ncreasing the number of playgrounds, gym,s and other facilities are not adequate t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09850746269 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70980661758 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561194029851 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9673616321 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290116186579 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918939903676 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733483021165 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170945062332 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579372662362 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.