In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
There is a growing trend that people are inclined to give up newspapers or books and turn to the Internet for news happening around the world. To the best of my knowledge, this point of view is reasonable for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that the increasing popularity of the Internet does a great job in providing news. Nowadays, many sociological studies have shown that although it is invisible, in contemporary society, the public have a curiousess about different kinds of content areas like traditional, cultural, environment or economics. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that the Internet with easy and widespread access can satisfy the requirements of information explosion by the ever-changing world. For example, online resources have greater advantages for the timeliness of coverage. In comparison, it takes a longer time to get news via newspapers or books as reporters spend too much time on writing, printing and producing news. This example is the illustration of the fact that the growing pervasiveness of online newspapers is accompanied by the development of modern society.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that many online news are inaccurate and unreliable due to the subjectivity of information posted by Internet users. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account to this is that online newspapers operated by professional organizations are dependable as they strictly stick to high demands of journalism. For instance, according to the survey conducted by BBC News, many online newspapers are highly appreciated by readers for the objective information as commentators. From this example, one can observe that with literacy skills, Internet users can choose trust-worthy sources.
In conclusion, online newspapers without paying have chronic positive effects on social life as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
- Some people say that family has the most powerful influence on a child s development however others say that influences outside the family play a bigger role on children Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Music has been and will continue to be the universal language of mankind To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The two plans below show the Pancha village in 2005 and 2015 78
- The pie charts below show the proportions of energy produced from 5 sources in a country in 1995 and 2003 78
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much online news', 'a good deal of online news'.
Suggestion: much online news; a good deal of online news
...ent raised by objectors to this is that many online news are inaccurate and unreliable due to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44590163934 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18206138322 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577049180328 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4212869831 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161352283508 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506972400225 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474515719928 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962477347735 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334480867026 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.