In Many Countries, paying for things using mobile phones (Cellphone) apps is becoming increasingly common.
Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?
The dynamics of the world have changed dramatically with the advent of groundbreaking smartphones technologies. It has become quite normal for users to make online payments for bills and shopping through different Android and IOS applications. Certainly, it has made life much easier for people, and the merits of e-payments largely offset the demerits.
First and foremost, consumers are no longer need to visit franchises for their utility bills payments in person. Many companies like PayPal, Paytm, Wepay, Visa, and MasterCard are providing facilities to make online payments through their official mobile apps with some super-simple steps. Subsequently, millions of people using this option of payment as it’s easy and fully secure. Secondly, online shopping has become easier like never before. People can buy most of the things online from Amazon, eBay, and noon mobile applications with credit cards. As a result, it is very easy to buy necessities such as groceries and other things of daily use through smartphones. On a further note, there are a number of promotions available on e-payments. Most of the companies encourage their customer to buy through their mobile apps and offer many discounts and rewards schemes with online shopping. Therefore, users can avail many bumper promotions by using this option.
Conversely, sometimes people misuse their credit cards on these online shopping apps. Some people have a propensity to buy expensive things like the latest mobile phones, watches, and branded dresses which makes them extravagant. Consequently, they start to fall into debt traps due to overspending beyond their income capacity. Furthermore, many people also experience an expectation gap when they receive their orders. They feel less value for money for items which they order online, especially clothes. They could buy better quality with less price if they visit any shopping mall. That’s is how many people also receive fake branded production. People, for instance, buying Nike and Adidas shirts on Facebook are most likely to receive fake products which waste of money and botheration for many buyers.
The conclusion to be drawn is that payments through mobile phones have made a much easier life for people as they can pay utility bills and shopping online; however, people sometimes misuse this facility and get into trouble. Because they end up paying heavy interest rates and received unsatisfying online orders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-15 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | minhhh123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | bilal_chaudhry | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | shadow1222 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | ernchawla | 84 | view |
- Schools in some countries require their students to wear a uniform What are the positives and negatives of this rule 86
- In some countries only few young people go to classical music concerts or or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 73
- In Many Countries paying for things using mobile phones Cellphone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 78
- In many countries today crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular Why do you think these books and TV Shows are popular What is your opinion of crime fiction and TV crime drama 73
- In companies promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company not to someone from outside or new hiring do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: ITS_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'That is'?
Suggestion: That is
... price if they visit any shopping mall. That’s is how many people also receive fake brand...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd received unsatisfying online orders.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4140625 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6370000493 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565104166667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8965835887 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16751396641 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500199714825 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343380145567 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107521715003 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261311731335 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.