The plans show Ashford in 2010 and Ashford now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The plans depict a range of modernization made to the layout of Ashford from 2010 until the present day.
Overall, the town has witnessed significant changes, prominent of which is the accommodation of new housing establishments as well as the cultivation of the ecosystem.
As per the diagram, there has been the erection of an apartment complex adjacent to Tam River. Additionally, it is noticeable that the smaller housing units scattering around the residential area have also increased in number with two new blocks constructed in front of those formerly built near the lane. Another development worth mentioning is the construction of the bridge connecting the east and west areas of the town. To specify, in 2010, there used to be two quays built for ferry commuters to cross the river. Nevertheless, in present days, this has been replaced by a new bridge.
In addition, to the southern part of the area, a new yacht marina has been built, aligning itself with the eastern land of Ashford. In opposite location to the aforementioned marina is the plantation of new trees as well as a small pond. The trees on the other side of the road, however, have been left untouched throughout the time.
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and i 84
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 73
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 87
- The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village car park now 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96551724138 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91490782303 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610837438424 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2786201387 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.065855470523 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263085699845 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496837710231 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532526160666 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637131819905 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.