In the modern world, people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technological advances have led to the general notion that animals should not be allocated to people’s food or other industries such as healthcare or clothing. From my perspective, I comprehensively dissent with this outlook owing to essential nutrients for human life and their vital function in the development of the world.
Admittedly, animals play a crucial role in not only the food chain but also nutritional value in daily life. First, animal-made food such as beef, pork and chicken contains a numerous variety of proteins and lipids which cannot lack at in regular meals. These kinds of nutrients are required for optimal development while fruit and vegetables do not have. With the supply of various substances, the body’s immune system gets drastically stronger when compared with that of people who do not consume protein diets, resulting in a healthy body. Moreover, the symbiotic or antagonistic relationships are several emblematic examples for mutual interactions among animals, including humans. This indicates that if humans cease using food from animals, their partners in these partnerships either lose or grow abnormally. As a result, food chain disorder is inevitable.
Furthermore, the evolution of humanity is attributed to drug manufacturing with main ingredients from animals. The popularity in using animal-derived pharmaceuticals such as rhinoceros horn, bear gallbladder are condemned since this practice is pushing rare animals to the verge of extinction. In the interim, the positive efficiency in employing animals in making drugs is inevitable. Perceptibly, there is no future in omitting animals in the medical industry; however, there may be a method to use wildlife responsibly by analyzing its chemical components at the molecular level. At every point, thanks to modern technologies, a DNA sequence is widely accepted in producing drugs or unveiling new treatment methods. For example, chlorotoxin Cy5.5, derived from the venom of scorpion Leiurus quinquestriatus, allows connection to ion channels on the surface of brain tumor cells. The toxin aids researchers to spot cancer lumps as small as 200 cells, making it 500 times more sensitive than MRI scans.
In terms of apparel, the utilization of animal-derived clothing is controversial due to humanitarian reasons; however, people cannot deny the quality of these products. The exploitation of fur and leather from cattle and poultry has benefited the fashion industry. For instance, the feather utilized in the garment industry is a by-product of food production. Another example is silkworm, this fabric repels moisture well, making it ideal for clothes because of its high level of absorbency. Furthermore, it wicks away colors efficiently, allowing manufacturers to utilize low-impact or natural dyes.
In conclusion, while the multitudes believe in a future without animal-based products, I believe that this idea is pretty impracticable, particularly in the food industry. Nonetheless, technological technologies in the current world will allow humans to limit the use of animals in the manufacture of products and items.
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 11
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
- Task 1 The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Going green is a good choice or not 88
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2658.0 1615.20841683 165% => OK
No of words: 475.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59578947368 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20801213032 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 176.041082164 170% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629473684211 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 839.7 506.74238477 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.256855163 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.565217391 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.652173913 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82608695652 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285154041902 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687310991034 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433585711025 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151682161698 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162874764938 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 78.4519038076 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2658.0 1615.20841683 165% => OK
No of words: 475.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59578947368 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20801213032 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 176.041082164 170% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629473684211 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 839.7 506.74238477 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.256855163 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.565217391 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.652173913 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82608695652 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285154041902 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687310991034 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433585711025 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151682161698 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162874764938 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 78.4519038076 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.