Task 1
The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week (in kilometers) in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the number of passenger kilometres covered by various means of transportation in the UK in the two years 1990 and 2000. The initial impression from the chart is that very few kilometres were travelled using bicycles, motorbikes and planes compared to buses and trains. It is also clear that whilst travelling by air, bus, train and in total enjoyed upswings, the opposite was true for bicycle and motorbike.
In 1990, bicycles and motorbikes were not used much in the UK, at only around 5 billion passenger-kilometres, and the figures even went down to 4 billion over the next 10 years. Also standing at the relatively low of 5 billion in 1990, aviation travel thereafter rose, albeit slightly, to roughly 8 billion in 2000.
Opposite patterns are evident in bus and train travel. Both started at a high of 42 billion and 40 billion (in that order) in 1990, and then rose to 50 billion in 2000. The total figure also grew from 100 billion to 110 billion over the same time frame.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-17 | trangtb2k5 | 63 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | trangtb2k5 | 92 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people and the table shows where people born in these country lives
- Task 1 The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- the graph below shows us consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone 73
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...wn to 4 billion over the next 10 years. Also standing at the relatively low of 5 bil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72727272727 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78126015645 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8434186796 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109957669588 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549129189412 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480317915898 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801742480651 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385114403863 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.