The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities
The column chart illustrates the differences and changes in the proportion of city citizens buying coffee and tea and drinking habits provided by three aspects in five different areas of Australia in last 4 weeks. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the number of people who bought fresh coffee ranked the top in most categories, except for Adelaide that was the second largest.
In particular, when it comes to fresh coffee buying, the top three positions were Melbourne, Hobart and Sydney at approximately 62%, followed by over 55% in Brisbane, which constantly accounted for the highest percentages in comparison with other aspects. Besides, it was accompanied by Adelaide at below 50%, which constituted the lowest score.
Meanwhile, in terms of instant coffee buying, the percentage of Hobart and Brisbane were at about 53%, which were the highest numbers, followed by Adelaide with 50%. It was accompanied by Melbourne and Sydney at around 48% and 46% respectively, which was the smallest percentages.
Regarding drinking habits, the top three proportions were roughly 43%, 42% and 38%, which was represented by Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart accordingly. Brisbane and Adelaide shared the equal percentage of around 34%, which were the lowest.
- The chart below shows changes in water levels of reservoirs in 6 cities in Australia between 2009 and 2010 70
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 78
- Nowadays it is more convenient and easier for people to travel to other countries Is this a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, if, regarding, second, so, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.315 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80780608305 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4311228012 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.875 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142281819667 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060918227026 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826118328199 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868555025494 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888504169349 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.