Criminals should be judged according to their personal circumstances rather than making them receive a fixed punishment. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that those committing crime should be judged individually based on their own circumstances. While I accept that this view is necessary to decide on an appropriate form of sanction, I believe that there are some advantages of fixed punishments.
The context of any criminal act should be taken into account when sentencing an offender. This means that the judge should consider the details of each particular case before deciding on the appropriate punishment. For example, a person who steals something from a shop for the first time should not be treated in the same way as a repeat offender who has been caught shoplifting many times before. It would be sensible to give the first-time offender a small punishment, such as a fine, while the repeat offender may be sent to prison.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that there are some good arguments for having one punishment for each crime. This system ensures that each member of society knows and understands the consequences of committing any crime. It is a fair system, and it leaves people with no doubt that breaking the law is not tolerated. At the same time, it is much easier for judges and lawyers when there is a clear rule dictating how each offender should be sentenced. For example, if someone is found guilty of stealing, the judge will simply follow the rules and apply the appropriate punishment.
In conclusion, it seems to me that a mature and humane legal system would be flexible in terms of how decisions about punishments are made based on fixed rules to maintain a fair and stable society.
- Criminals should be judged according to their personal circumstances rather than making them receive a fixed punishment Do you agree or disagree 61
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83823529412 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72165122318 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577205882353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.801030731 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16017169842 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059202178603 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431307009548 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990034238808 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280904502017 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.