The chart gives information about the proportion of students choosing different science subjects in a university in 1992 and 2000.
The 2 bar charts reveal information about the percentage of students of a university in choosing 3 science subjects namely Biology, Physics, and Computer Science by gender in 1992 and 2012. Each unit is measured in percent (%).
As can be seen from the diagram, the number of males in choosing science subjects was higher than the one of females in both years. The ratio of Biology was the highest with under 70% and over 40% in 1992 and 2012, respectively.
To begin with, the proportion of women was just over 30% in 1992, which made of one-second of men. After the next 20 years, there was a slight decrease to 50% in the percentage of males. By contrast, a mass rise of nearly 20% was recorded in the ratio of females.
In 1992, the proportion of Computer Science was just under 5%, which is the lowest ratio among all subjects, it then went up dramatically to over 20% in 2012. Another striking feature is that the percentage of Physics remained stable around 20% in both years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | dungnguyen2580 | 78 | view |
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free Goverments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the average monthly temperature in three major cities 78
- The graph below show the average monthly temperature in three major cities 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 85
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64772727273 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51333066887 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585227272727 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0652677218 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234991000649 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873903836785 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134170442449 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158838929908 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139111946571 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.