Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
The efficacy of doing several tasks has always been among the most controversial subjects, which often provoke many discussions. Some people keep endorsing the claim that people are able to do all different tasks comprehensively well, whereas others dismiss this idea. It is my firm conviction that people are not capable of doing all things together well, and I cling to this view point for the following reasons.
The first and most significant reason is that busy people cannot concentrate on all things very well. It is an indisputable fact that concentration is the key factor to success in whatever we have planned to do. obviously, busy people ought to focus on multiple subjects and task which each one requires its own accuracy and attention. Since our brain is able to accurately and completely focus on a couple of important things, all task would not achieve the right and deserved attention. As the result, only a few tasks during a day will be done with our whole ability and precision. To delineate, take my experience as a compelling example of this. Once that I was adversely occupied during my week, I decided to take on several tasks on one day to get rid of them soon. I had to do many things together such as completing the interior design of the clients' home, cooking and shopping. Therefore, hardly I could focus on each of the completely; I was thinking about when to cook potato's when I was modeling the clients house. Unfortunately, I messed up totally and send the wrong renders and plans for the client and the design lacked so many notions that they had advised me.
The second pivotal vindicating point that I should mention here is time. as a matter of fact, time can be accounted as the other limiting factor. When we are forced to take on different things in a limited time, the net time that would be allocated to each task is less than normal standards. Occasionally, hastily doing tasks will lead to unexpected and inefficient consequences. It is obvious that devoting time to every thing and doing things patiently will promote the quality of doing it. My own previously mentioned example clearly demonstrate that if I had more time to preparing my clients' designs, I would be able to review their notes and recall their advises and depicting a better design.
To put it in a nutshell, adversely occupied people are not capable of handling too many diverse tasks together. As it has been mentioned, low and inadequate concentration on these tasks and time limitation will give rise to insufficient and undesired results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | zmz | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncentrate on all things very well. It is an indisputable fact that concentration ...
^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...int that I should mention here is time. as a matter of fact, time can be accounted...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83409090909 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74713881961 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536363636364 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4582410948 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9523809524 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275654771828 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807342532124 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874117937723 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162687267623 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884819670166 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.