The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment
It is true that there is an increasing number of productions of consumer goods lead to affect to the natural environment. As far as I am concerned, this phenomenon can result in serious problems, which can be tackled using appropriate measures.
It is possibly said that this issue may be caused by some main factors. One of the prominent reasons concerning this problem is overlogging while the proportion of wood decrease seriously. This is because many dwellers have the propensity for exploiting plenty of valuable woods from the forest in the natural environment, which led to run out of precious wood. Henceforth, residents are considered as a chief culprit behind the decrease in the amount of valuable wood. For example, people often use a lot of furniture is made by wood such as desk, chair and bookshelf. Meanwhile, they are one of main components of wood which citizens manufacture for meeting the needs of them since valuable wood become exhausting.
In truth, some imperative measures ought to be taken to resolve these prospective issues. Promoting simple lifestyle is highly suggested, which prevent previous wood from exploitation. Moreover, it is people’s responsibility to protect wood from loggers and they need to plant more trees to grow comfortable atmosphere. Therefore, protecting forest resources should be concerned since people will have a clean air for healthier lungs. In addition, producers are encouraged to turn to exploiting wood as the alternative to finding eco-friendly material to protect and improve valuable wood in the forest.
In conclusion, there are indeed various repercussions regarding rate of production of consumer goods, yet, they can be solved once according measures are enlisted imperatively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37454545455 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04641775813 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614545454545 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1622645951 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.571428571 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972647842879 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386913807459 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950196701705 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925798828819 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105354829822 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.