The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided diagram illustrates the production of clothes from recycled plastic bottles.

Looking from an overall perspective, the process consists of 3 main stages, beginning with gathering and transporting plastic bottles followed by cleaning steps and culminating in processing to make the final products which are ready to make clothing.

As presented in the diagram, in the first step, empty plastic bottles are gathered and transported to the factories. There, they are sorted out and the qualified ones undergo a process called cutting. In the subsequent step, the cut bottled are washed carefully. The cleaning stage culminates with drying the byproducts under sunshine.

After being dried for an exact amount of time, the byproducts are boiled and then strained to become yarn. They are now ready to go through a process called weaving to become fabric. The process of making clothes from plastic bottles ends with rolling fabric to sew clothing.

Votes
Average: 4.4 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-26 hien3112 78 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-10-25 hien3112 67 view
2024-10-20 hahoaan 84 view
Essays by user minhpn :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41059602649 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67034452456 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0287989049 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279188926916 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108807254226 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105740012077 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176317889528 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549946212239 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41059602649 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67034452456 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0287989049 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279188926916 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108807254226 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105740012077 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176317889528 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549946212239 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.