Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
In today’s life, needing a source of earning money is undeniable, so a job plays a significant role in each person’s life. Since individuals spend a huge time at the workplace, obviously job satisfaction is an important factor that should be considered. In this line of thought, some people believe that working just three days a week prolonged can be more pleasurable for an employee, rather than working five days a week regularly. Personally speaking, I disagree with this idea for two main reasons which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that five-day working per week with less working time gives the persons a chance to spend more time with their family, especially their kids, during each day, thereby preventing conflicts with their loved ones. Moreover, a five-day work schedule provides a situation for all family members to have the same timeframe and can enjoy their free time together. For example, while children are at school, their parents going to their 8-hour per day careers, and after work and school, all the family can gather at home and enjoy the rest of the day mutually. Allocating sufficient hours to family leads to a strong relationship among family members and overall happiness in personal life.
The second exquisite point to be mentioned is that regarding people's hectic lives, it goes without saying that all people need some time to take their mind off of work and duties, in order to reduce their stresses and work pressure. By working three days per week for long hours, individuals would face heavy pressure at the workplace, resulting in their mental and physical health damage, which plays a pivotal role in people's lives. In addition, not only will these health problems directly affect employee’s performance but also decrease the company’s outputs. So, neither the company nor the employees will have the satisfaction of this circumstance and cooperation.
In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned reasons into account, I believe that working for shorter hours during five days is more enjoyable since it provides the person a condition to spend more time with the family and it will also increase the productivity and efficiency of the job both for the person and company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why TPO56 G 81
- TPO15 80
- TPO45 70
- TPO 63 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12834224599 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70418031059 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8896708744 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.538461538 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7692307692 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334644992042 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116792627569 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880136544144 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219103724291 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539191332511 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.