Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994
Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map shows the development of the village.
The map shows the growth of a village called Chorleywood between 1868 and 1994.
It is clear that the village grew as the transport infrastructure was improved. Four periods of development are shown on the map, and each of the populated areas is near to the main roads, the railway or the motorway.
From 1868 to 1883, Chorleywood covered a small area next to one of the main roads. Chorleywood Park and Golf Course is now located next to this original village area. The village grew along the main road to the south between 1883 and 1922, and in 1909 a railway line was built crossing this area from west to east. Chorleywood station is in this part of the village.
The expansion of Chorleywood continued to the east and west alongside the railway line until 1970. At that time, a motorway was built to the east of the village, and from 1970 to 1994, further development of the village took place around motorway intersections with the railway and one of the main roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-20 | Chinkiarora | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-26 | yashu_5219 | 56 | view |
- Banning cars from city centres is a recent trend and it can be seen in various cities around the world Certain advantages and disadvantages immediately spring to mind when considering this step that city councils are taking The advantages are clear Since 73
- Many different countries have most shops and products as the same Some consider it a positive development whereas others consider it negative Discuss both sides and give your opinion 67
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers They are used in business hospitals crime detection and even to fly planes What things will they be used for in the future Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of 89
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government s responsibility Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 1615.20841683 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 174.0 315.596192385 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64367816092 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53541437774 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 176.041082164 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511494252874 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 506.74238477 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8324727991 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 7.06120827912 3% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305550976237 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144088945446 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12066388215 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238333788399 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139141046288 0.056905535591 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 50.2224549098 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.58 8.58950901804 77% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 78.4519038076 28% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.