Phone use
The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The pie graphs shows what activities the teenagers in one African country used their phones for during a four-year period from 2016 to 2019.
In general, most of the teenagers joined the social networks and the trend increased each years. It is worth to mention that the number of teenagers taking photos by digital camera went up annually while writing emails and phone-calling became less common in the same period.
The usage of social networks always contributed the most in four graphs, at 50%, 48%, 51% and 56% from 2016 to 2019 respectively. Email-writing was the second popular activities of teenagers when using phone, contributed a quarter in 2016. However, during the four-year period, the demand for this activity reduce gradually, from 25% to 24% in 2017 and 19% in 2019.
In 2016, the number of teenagers using digital camera came third of the list, at 15%, followed by the figure of phone-calling at 10%. In the next four year, there is an increase in number of teenager using digital camera, by 4% in 2019. Meanwhile, the phone calls were experienced a reduction through out the period, reduced to halve of the number of its in 2016.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Phone use The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 73
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 294, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...hone calls were experienced a reduction through out the period, reduced to halve of the num...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, so, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 26.3917525773 155% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 937.175257732 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8730964467 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60688440946 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58883248731 0.622605031667 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 22.9061423645 44.8134815571 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 4.34317383033 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234857499753 0.216113520407 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109220647774 0.0766984524023 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887536676289 0.0603063233224 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169447042184 0.12726935374 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979584532447 0.0580467560999 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 8.37731958763 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 8.71597938144 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.