Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Government should not provide financial support to artists (For example, painters, writer, musicians …), and the government should let them support themselves.
Firstly, government funding of artists is inequitable for the taxpayers. To specify, now that artistic creations are not basic necessity of life, it is unfair that every taxpayer, the major benefactor of such funding, need to contribute towards such creations that they seldom engage with. Admittedly, every individual enjoys some forms of art, be it through movies, music or books.
However, such forms of art are highly lucrative. With considerable revenue gained from the tickets fees and relevant industries, filmmakers, actors, singers and composers are more than capable to support themselves, and the government funding for them is thus undoubtedly redundant. In this case, if those artists are still subsidized by the government, complaints from the masses may be the necessary result. As for the artists whose creations are highbrow or caviar to the general, the rich or the art aficionado should fund them out of their own pocket instead of seeking funding from the government.
Furthermore, while the artists are expected to be motivated by the financial support, they are more likely to become excessively reliant on it, which is certainly undesirable. In other words, when they are aware that no matter whether their works can sell well, their livelihood is still ensured by the government’s subsidy, hardly can they be forceful enough honing their creations. In this case, how can we expect any more masterpieces? On the contrary, without the government funding, artists may be moremeticulous in creating, most likely because they would otherwise find it hard toearn their bread from those creations.
Hence, for the advent of elaborate pieces of art, the artists should not be funded by the government.
To sum up, considering the potential complaints from the taxpayers and negative effects brought by the over reliance, artists are better to support themselves than to be subsidized by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-30 | Storyline | 88 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | Storyline | view | |
| 2021-11-12 | JoeyRussell07 | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | LAPLACE DEMON | 82 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | LAPLACE DEMON | 83 | view |
- When you re interested in a company or position which of the following do you think is the best way to successfully find a job 1 Ask as many friends as possible for job vacancy information both in person and through social media 2 Send a letter about your 87
- When you give money to the charitable organizations would you prefer to choose how the donation will be used for example donate money on food service or advertisement for organizations or leave the decision to the organizations 76
- Imagine that you have been given the opportunity to advise the government of a city or region area that you are familiar with to spend more money on ONE thing to benefit the city or region Which ONE of these do you believe would be the most beneficial for 48
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more obsessed with buying material things like expensive clothes and cars because people judge each other according to their possessions Agree or disagree 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Government should not provide financial support to artists For example painters writer musicians and the government should let them support themselves 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, as for, in other words, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33881578947 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87488520486 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7176649635 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.846153846 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 5.45110844103 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186718949188 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683658266913 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557824062371 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108126414214 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283898996478 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.