When you give money to the charitable organizations, would you prefer to choose how the donation will be used (for example, donate money on food, service or advertisement for organizations) or leave the decision to the organizations?
Charity and donation seem to be an undividable part of social life nowadays. Charitable organization provides effective help to the needy in time. Some people would like to donate the money and leave the decisions to the organizations to spend it. However, from my point of view, I would prefer to choose how the donation will be used.
To begin with, deciding to choose how the donation will be use is more efficient and effective. To be more specific, people should do some investigations and search on the information on the Internet before they donate money in order to maximize the degree of helping others. A genuine example is the year of 2004, when a large scale of earthquake happened in Wenchuan, China. People worldwide are will to offer help and offers money to the Red Cross. Actually, what local people need most is water and food. As you can see, contribute money blindly is inefficient and not desirable.
In addition, this approach will give people a sense of achievement and inspires others to do the same thing. For instance, I used to help an elementary school student who live in rural regions. He lived in a family of poverty and his family could not even afford him to go into junior high school. Since he was eight years old, I gave him one hundred dollars every month to meet the tuition fee of a local school. Finally, he graduated from his elementary school and went to the best local junior high school in this town. He studied hard and got scholarship from his school and now he didn’t need my donation any more. However, he still writes letters to thank me and tells me about some exciting things he met in school. That give me a sense of achievement and the story moved the people around me a lot. Now, they all begin to do donation and connect directly to those people they would like to help.
Admittedly, leaving the decision for the organization to consider may be more direct and convenient. Nevertheless, virtuous donators and benefactors should keep their eye on it because of the charity fraud. Some bad charitable institutions would use the money people donate to make some misguide investment and fill their own wallets, instead of buying necessities for the needy. As a result, it would be better for people to choose how the donation will be used.
In conclusion, it seems to be plausible and wise for people to choose how their money for charity will be used, rather than leaving the decision for the organizations to consider directly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-24 | LAPLACE DEMON | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | LAPLACE DEMON | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Economy growth should not be slowed down by concerns about environment 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Economy growth should not be slowed down by concerns about environment 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Economy growth should not be slowed down by concerns about environment 76
- Nowadays many job interviewers and employers are looking for various additional sources of information to better understand a job applicant Which is the best way for the employers to better know the situation of a job applicant 1 Contacting previous emplo 96
- Parents give their children primary school students weekly money to buy whatever they want Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children while others think the opposite Which opinion do you agree with and why 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 780, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...ense of achievement and the story moved the people around me a lot. Now, they all begin to do donati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74022988506 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60307043514 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510344827586 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4723974665 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9166666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406323318097 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111734863942 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104205419509 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277242110712 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123154157315 0.0645574589148 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.