Despite a large number of gyms, a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world. What problems are associated with this? What solutions can you suggest?
The current flourishing trend of computerizing offices and accommodations has not only conductive aspects but also numerous disadvantages. Consequently, the way of living in which sitting is the main action is a contemporary prevalence regardless of the growing number of gyms. Although there are many problematic situations associated with this trend, governments and corporations are taking measures to deal with it.
A sedentary lifestyle undoubtedly results in a great deal of undesirable consequences. In terms of health and fitness, this trend has aggravated the circumstances of obesity, especially in preschoolers and teenagers since this is able to exacerbate their further careers. Overweight is also connected to extreme heart diseases. The USA is often cited as an example to prove the case. Apart from that, sitting-dominated lifestyle can weaken social close-knit. This is primarily because it can lead to the deprivation in social interaction and face-to-face meetings at public areas, particularly for those who work in home offices.
Fortunately, measures are being implemented by national authorities and both state-owned and private companies to gradually solve these unwanted results. In terms of governments, they are capable of raising citizens awareness of relevant health problems and promoting them to do exercises on a regular basis. This can be achieved by creating more recreational activities and places funded by local residents or by hosting a sport event. Likewise, companies have the ability to provide their employees with additional short-term responsibilities that require active motions such as driving, walking and searching for practical information from customers with an insurance of a higher remuneration. For example, many multinational corporations are establishing temporary conventional marketing positions in which going around to investigate and evaluate potential markets is compulsory.
To put it simply, a sedentary lifestyle is associated with numerous undesirable consequences related to health, fitness and social interaction. To mitigate to situations, governments and companies are trying different procedures including sport events and additional temporary jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 70 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | ZAINBM | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | emkay | 73 | view |
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting anf reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- IN MANY COUNTRIES THE NUMBER OF ANIMALS AND PLANTS ARE DECLINING WHY DO YOU THINK IT IS HAPPENING HOW TO SOLVE THE ISSUE 11
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...overnments, they are capable of raising citizens awareness of relevant health problems a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, likewise, so, apart from, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98119122257 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43374252816 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648902821317 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8600638394 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15367495079 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432817290696 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417855890416 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895302816775 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208371282659 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.